Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

 
 

View User's Journal

Report This Entry Subscribe to this Journal
Ralo's Blog
Definitions of Goth and Validity [Public]
User Image

So recently I engaged in some discussions relating to the term "darkly inclined" in the comments of a YouTube video discussing the term. That is a decent small goth channel which is pretty underrated and they def deserve some love.

My first comment was basically saying how the term is actually quite invalidating for a number of reasons and me being my slightly trolly self, I did meme the first negative comment that I got. [x]

There also were several positive comments I got in response to my original one and as of typing this, my original comment got 20 likes which is pretty nice.

User Image

Today I woke up to another reply to my comment which was a little more insightful and is basically what inspired me to write this entry. [x]

In short, the person was saying that I'm attempting to create a 'new definition of goth' when actually, I'm not and my personal definition is what has always been even before the goth movement.

Now I already have this on my thread op under the FAQ section, the definitions and history to goth but I will sum it up here as well. For anyone interested in seeing the full post, here. I've also stated actual definitions according to Merriam Webster in my other related entry about The Goth vs "Darkly Inclined" Debacle.

Alright then, lets dissect this.

Goth: 1, rock music marked by dark and morbid lyrics.
2, a fan or performer of goth. 3, a person who wears mostly black clothing, uses dark dramatic makeup, and often has dyed black hair.


First and foremost, do I agree with those definitions? Yes. Goth music is goth lol. *nod nod* And someone who mostly wears black, and dresses in a dark manor using makeup etc, can be considered goth. Again, yes. Am I aware that not anyone who wears all black is necessarily goth? Yes, of course but I digress as that's not the point of this entry.

Now what is my personal definition of goth summed up? Why hating the sun, smoking and drinking coffee of course. -South Park Goth kids.

I'm kidding of course. Though I love the goth kids lol. Anyways, goth is a conglomeration of various dark interests, ie, the music, the look, the aesthetic, the style, dark atmosphere and so on. When one has an interest in a fair amount of all that, then they are goth. In my opinion at least.

Now, is someone goth when they only like goth music in my opinion? No, because in my view, goth is what I just said, a conglomeration of several interests rather than just one. Same goes if someone only likes the fashion but not anything else related to it. Also not goth in my opinion.

However! I'm not going to tell someone they're 'not goth' for that because it's not my place and is incredibly invalidating and I personally, never want to do that to someone. It sucks feeling invalidated. What I feel matters most in terms of 'you are or you aren't' is if you're genuine. Genuine in your own interest and mindset that is. Related, The Goth Mindset.

Example, if someone wants to just 'dress goth for a day' or 'to get views on Tiktok' or whatever, that isn't genuine. If someone really loves the music and wants to identify as goth while not liking a single other thing related to it, then it's honestly their right to do that. Would I exclude them from anything? ******** no man. That'd be so wrong. Do I think less of them? Again, no. Is it wrong of me that I don't consider that to be goth? Again, no. We are entitled to our opinions and so long as we are being respectful, I see no harm in it.

I'd also like to mention that I've never met anyone who identifies like that. As in, only likes the music and nothing else dark that considers themself goth. I also don't even imagine that's too common either. I've said before that in most cases, when someone is into any dark aesthetic, they're more than likely going to have other, similar interests.

Now back to the comment that inspired this whole entry. So how they were saying 'I'm attempting to make a new definition of goth.' I do not see it that way as I've already stated. I've said several times before, goth has always been but not under that title. If anything, I see it the other way around and feel that the newer definition is where "being goth means only liking goth music." I've been into the subculture for a long time and have only been hearing that in the recent years. If I were to make a guess, I might say I only started hearing that for about 5 years now or so.

I am also not a fan of this newer definition as I feel it's a bit divisive. I'd also like to state that, it's possible this definition is far older and could have even started with the goth movement itself back in the late 70s, but I haven't heard of it. Lets consider that it is that old. Okay so would that change anything in my view? No. Because things grow and evolve over time. Take for example goth itself. Was pastel goth always a thing? It's possible but for the sake of my point lets say no. That being said, goth has grown to incorporate more things, more styles, more types of music and so on.

Does this make any of the newer things less valid because they weren't a part from the start? Absolutely not. Like I said, so long as things are genuine, they can be considered part of the whole. There's absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to put a new spin on something that already exists. We are creative beings and after all, DIY and uniqueness is a huge aspect of the subculture over all.

Now back to the newer or at least 'newer definition to me personally.' My thoughts on "goth being only about music". I've said before that I don't like that because it is very invalidating and divisive and in a way it does still take the goth out of goth so to speak. Will I tell someone that it's invalid? In my own respectful way I do. Because again, there simply is more to goth than just music.

In closing, I think that people just need to be more mindful and respectful of what they say and how they treat others. Do I think everyone that goes by that definition is a goth Karen? Only if they are rude and dismissive about it. Like I said, we're all entitled to our own opinions so long as we are genuine and respectful. Fact is, if we feel we're goth for liking dark things then that's all it takes. Sure one should educate themselves with the history of the subculture but so long as they're genuine and respectful of others, it's all I could really ask of anyone.

Never tell anyone they are not what they claim to be when they're genuine. It's not up to you or I, it's up to them as it's their own life. We can have our opinions but unless asked, we should keep it to ourselves if it's something that could cause them to feel invalidated.


Ralodosmovo
Community Member
  • [03/17/25 04:36pm]
  • [03/14/25 04:22pm]
  • [03/12/25 04:27pm]
  • [02/28/25 01:51pm]
  • [02/04/25 01:42pm]
  • [01/29/25 04:14pm]
  • [01/12/25 04:54pm]
  • [01/12/25 01:17am]
  • [01/11/25 08:27pm]
  • [01/07/25 06:46pm]


  • User Comments: [3]
    Quote:
    I think that people just need to be more mindful and respectful of what they say and how they treat others


    Respect is an essential virtue, indispensable for nourishing any culture, subculture, or community, it is the foundation behind mutual understanding and collective growth!

    Hey Ralo, I really wanted to post on your blog again since this space is alr here, elegant and thoughtful. I wanted to put my ideas in order, while addressing the problems around validation in music subcultures, although based on the punks.

    The following are thoughts that started as a reflection of the gatekeeping that occurred in the 90's punk scene: In general in many communities there are not explicit, univocal forms of authority and neither clear formal norms (eg. a formally universally accepted definition of punk or goth), yet without identifiable structures beyond common interests, values or symbols, only members themselves act as authority figures policing, normativizing and spreading the subculture (like the Bromley Contingent); characterizing and defining their values and expressing them through their art (or expressions like clothing) where they are manifested as symbols.

    Now I believe the problem of ‘defining’ strives at least in part in that subcultures evolve and values that shaped the subculture in its origins are not perceived nor practiced the same across time periods and geographies. In the past, at the origin of the musical scenes behind the subculture, symbols and figures (like Iggy or Sex Pistols) were more powerful, widely identifiable within the subculture’s members drawing clearer lines of belonging, of attitudes (like the DIY) and roles, the ‘mindset’, where a consistent ethos was present. Nowadays those lines have been blurred for reasons like: 1st Certain elements started being slowly incorporated into the mainstream, becoming fashion co-opted by the industry and the media 2nd the mainstream culture is also more accepting of alternative subcultures 3rd at the start there were fewer artist/activists that at their core may have shared integrated anti-establishment and transgressive values expressing such messages in their lyrics but groups diversified and incorporated new elements (like Skate) and themes.

    In the 90’s where more melodic sounds and emotional themes teens identified with were incorporated, commercially successful mainstream pop punk bands signed to major labels and distanced themselves from politics: punk flooded the mainstream. For the newer generation the perception of punk shifted. Similar to Goth, some of the punks that hold up its grassroots values still opt to be exclusive, attempting to shape the fabric of subculture as how it was, how they believe it should be, there is a power dynamic in that (as it happened in your yt discussion) it is invalidating for those not envisioning or aligning with the same ideals for the subculture The question arises then: what *should* define a Goth / a Punk? And it will have contingent answers, for some it will have to involve the music scene and the mindset, for most is getting to be just the interests/tastes, yet for others it can be more broad, extending and incorporating aspects not envisioned in the highly-tied-to-the-music original conception in just a mindset.

    To conclude in regards to validation/discrimination, there are spaces where exclusivity and elitism are needed, like places that require high level expertise, but its not good in music subcultures. I think mindfulness and respect go a long way, if new people are open to Goth/Punk it is better to invite them to discover the genuine roots rather than just pushing them away. While it's true that popular expressions in the media have diluted its ethos, it is by fostering the communities we want to be part of that values are transmitted and the cultural torch is passed.

    comment Minerva Leventis · Community Member · Wed Jul 09, 2025 @ 05:46pm
    @Minerva Leventis tysm. It means a lot that people get me where I'm coming from on all this. First off, ty for your insightful and very genuine input. It was very well said and I always appreciate such things. I get where you're coming from on it for sure and agree with you. However, I do feel a need to define such things to help others that are wanting to learn, to get more of an understanding of it all. I also like to cover as much of these kind of topics that I can whenever they come across my mind.

    I've been kind of sitting on some new ideas for things to talk about but I'd like to keep it all relevant to the topic of the goth subculture when I can. That being said, it's part of why I've been sitting on them for so long. Anyways, I will def share around whenever I post a new entry to the goth blog. Do stay tuned with the thread to keep an eye out for more entries. c:


    comment Ralodosmovo · Community Member · Wed Jul 09, 2025 @ 07:13pm
    Np Ralo always love to check out content open to acceptance and solidarity in these chaotic times where invalidating discourses are rampant! heart

    I'm not near knowledgable enough in many areas redface but still wanted to mention that cultural theory can provide a critical lens and a conceptual body to analyze the conflicts within subcultures. But in general there are plenty of ethical and social theories that could approach the matter to get insights on socially constructed institutions and definitions/discourses!

    Also after the recent research, I learned that among the divided attitudes of the punk movement there will always be groups that champion the core original values and mentality and continue building upon them. There are bands that now touch intersectional themes like feminism and gender politics. Maybe an idea for your blog could be talking about other people or groups that disagree in reducing goth to music and embrace broader definitions or those refuse the dark inclined label.

    comment Minerva Leventis · Community Member · Thu Jul 10, 2025 @ 12:26pm
    User Comments: [3]

     
     
    Manage Your Items
    Other Stuff
    Get GCash
    Offers
    Get Items
    More Items
    Where Everyone Hangs Out
    Other Community Areas
    Virtual Spaces
    Fun Stuff
    Gaia's Games
    Mini-Games
    Play with GCash
    Play with Platinum